Longmans, 1867. Hardcover.
Condition: Good. Great condition 2-volume set. Darker embellished sheets with
gold lettering to spine, minor wear/tears and little misfortune to limits,
incl. a split between back spread and spine of vol. 1. Page edges generally
cut. Past proprietor's name to the two volumes. Restricting is tight, pages are
secure. Textblocks and pictures are brilliant and clear. A not too bad
gathering. Great condition is characterized as: a duplicate that has been
perused however stays in clean condition. The majority of the pages are
unblemished and the spread is flawless and the spine may give indications of
wear. The book may have minor markings which are not explicitly referenced.
Most things will be dispatched the equivalent or the following working day.
This is a multiplication of a book
distributed before 1923. This book may have periodic blemishes for example,
absent or obscured pages, poor pictures, errant imprints, and so on that were
either part of the first curio, or on the other hand were presented by the
examining procedure. We accept this work is socially significant, and
regardless of the defects, have chosen to bring it again into print as a major
aspect of our proceeding with pledge to the safeguarding of printed works
around the world. We value your comprehension of the defects in the
safeguarding procedure, and expectation you appreciate this profitable book.
Macaulay's initially expositions
were added to Knight's Quarterly Magazine, however in January 1825 the
Edinburgh Review distributed an article of his on West Indian subjugation and
in August of that year a paper on Milton which made his name. Throughout the
following twenty years he wound up one of their most ordinary and most
well-known analysts, and his achievement in this line advanced his ascent in
governmental issues. In 1843 he was induced to gather his surveys in book
structure, and the Critical and Historical Essays were properly distributed by
Longman in three volumes. Macaulay confined the accumulation to his commitments
to the Edinburgh Review, and left out a portion of these additionally,
particularly those which he thought were of fleeting interest or which actually
assaulted previous political adversaries.
Comments
Post a Comment